In any case regarding the divorce of a couple with kids, there is usually the issue of who is best to be with the kid. Normally both parents will file for the custody of the child and prevent the other from having them if they believe they are not worthy. The jury or the attorney will have to go for the psychological testing child custody so that they can come up with the best resolution.
The whole essence of this testing is aimed at ensuring that the kids are left in the hands of the most responsible parents. More so, the kid will have the privilege of enjoying the best environment that will go ahead at promoting both their mental, physical and emotional growth.
The previous life the kid had in the hands of both parents is the pivot of the working of this evaluation. If they were with a parent who was never caring, was abusive or hostile to their kid the test can be able to reflect it. On the other hand, a good parenting comprising of good care and love will also be shown by the test.
The evaluation is diverse enough to ensure the results obtained are inclusive. This is why both parents and the kids have to undergo this test. Its good results make it the only test approached for the longest time in history. It has a scientific approach making it free from any kid of biases. If this happens, there are the measures that are normally kept in place to handle it.
The evaluation can be done in some ways, but interviewing and observations are the commonest and easiest. Observations include watching what the parents do on their daily basis even when around them. Interviewing includes a series of questions that the parents and the kid have to answer but at different times and their responses recorded.
Despite being a good way of ensuring the safety, well-being and best interest of these kids, this kind of testing has never fallen short of being criticized. To begin with, there is the aspect of a validity of the results especially from the answers given by the parents during interviews. One may end up neglecting the truth so that they have the kids by their sides.
Additionally, parenting skills of a person in some cases may have a different bearing on the social life of a person. In most cases, some parents have been denied the custody of their kids because they had a criminal record in the past or they are smokers, yet they are good at taking care of their kids. There are others who seem to have perfect lives with no time for the child.
Moreover, different people have different social-cultural backgrounds. This aspect of life includes disciplining the kid. A parent may have a different approach from that of their spouse. If the court or the attorney shares a common cultural background with either of the two, the custody may appear to be biased. All in all, this means is still the best if checks and balances are kept in place.
The whole essence of this testing is aimed at ensuring that the kids are left in the hands of the most responsible parents. More so, the kid will have the privilege of enjoying the best environment that will go ahead at promoting both their mental, physical and emotional growth.
The previous life the kid had in the hands of both parents is the pivot of the working of this evaluation. If they were with a parent who was never caring, was abusive or hostile to their kid the test can be able to reflect it. On the other hand, a good parenting comprising of good care and love will also be shown by the test.
The evaluation is diverse enough to ensure the results obtained are inclusive. This is why both parents and the kids have to undergo this test. Its good results make it the only test approached for the longest time in history. It has a scientific approach making it free from any kid of biases. If this happens, there are the measures that are normally kept in place to handle it.
The evaluation can be done in some ways, but interviewing and observations are the commonest and easiest. Observations include watching what the parents do on their daily basis even when around them. Interviewing includes a series of questions that the parents and the kid have to answer but at different times and their responses recorded.
Despite being a good way of ensuring the safety, well-being and best interest of these kids, this kind of testing has never fallen short of being criticized. To begin with, there is the aspect of a validity of the results especially from the answers given by the parents during interviews. One may end up neglecting the truth so that they have the kids by their sides.
Additionally, parenting skills of a person in some cases may have a different bearing on the social life of a person. In most cases, some parents have been denied the custody of their kids because they had a criminal record in the past or they are smokers, yet they are good at taking care of their kids. There are others who seem to have perfect lives with no time for the child.
Moreover, different people have different social-cultural backgrounds. This aspect of life includes disciplining the kid. A parent may have a different approach from that of their spouse. If the court or the attorney shares a common cultural background with either of the two, the custody may appear to be biased. All in all, this means is still the best if checks and balances are kept in place.
About the Author:
To find out more about psychological testing child custody cases, visit this qualified doctor's website now. The following homepage contains all the facts at http://drjamesrflens.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment